Search
11 results
ACTIVE FILTERS
Sulla evoluzione della società a responsabilità limitata
Abstract: On the evolution of limited liability companies – After providing some historical background on the origins of limited liability companies, the paper emphasizes their “artificial” and “experimental” nature. In this context, it recalls the prospects of the 2004 reform and reports on the outcome of the subsequent legislation, which also allowed this type of company access to public savings. This leads to some systematic and methodological considerations, especially regarding the problems arising from the adoption of a type of company for circumstances that do not correspond to those considered by the legislator when laying down the rules.
Summary: 1. Premessa. – 2. Il carattere “artificiale” e “sperimentale” della s.r.l. – 3. S.r.l., modelli organizzativi di impresa e concorrenza tra ordinamenti. – 4. La prospettiva della riforma del 2004. – 5. Gli interventi successivi del legislatore. – 6. L’esito del possibile appello al pubblico risparmio. – 7. Nome e tipo per le società di capitali. – 8. Implicazioni di sistema e di metodo. – 9. S.r.l. “aperta”, responsabilità degli amministratori e art. 2476 cod. civ.
Keywords: Company — History — Types and names of companies — Contractual freedom — Regulatory gaps and integration.
Abstract: Hegemony of enterprise - Using a recent book of Giovanni Cabras as a starting point, the Author examines the causes of the “hegemony of enterprise” in contemporary society and the implications that the large-scale establishment of AI could have in the near future, should it replace human beings in intellectual activities.
Summary: 1. Le tinte dell’affresco. – 2. I vecchi e il nuovo mondo. – 3. “Capire” l’AI. – 4. Impresa e tecnica sono due facce della stessa realtà. – 5. Le tecniche sostituiscono l’agire umano meccanico. – 6. L’ultima tecnica sostituirà anche l’agire umano mentale? – 7. Quale futuro per l’umanità dopo l’AI? Apocalittici ed integrati.
Keywords: Enterprises — General Theory of Law.
Sulla liquidazione giudiziale della società incorporata (o fusa)
Abstract: On merged company indipendent bankruptcy – The essay critically analyses the consolidated favorable position of the Italian Supreme Court on a merged company’s independent bankruptcy procedure, focusing on the contradiction of this solution both: to the legal creditor protection and to the irreversibility of merger effects by one side; and to the new rules of Codice della crisi e dell’insolvenza on extraordinary operations and on the relation within insolvency proceedings and the termination of the debtor’s business, on the other side.
Summary: 1. Un consolidato (ma discutibile) indirizzo giurisprudenziale. – 2. Premessa metodologica: peculiarità dell’“estinzione” dell’incorporata e sostanziale neutralità dell’inquadramento teorico della fusione per la soluzione del problema. – 3. Inconciliabilità del fallimento (oggi: liquidazione giudiziale) dell’incorporata con il principio di continuità nelle operazioni straordinarie (art. 2504-bis c.c.). – 4. Il rilievo sistematico della soppressione del divieto di partecipazione ad operazioni straordinarie di società soggette a procedure concorsuali e del loro proficuo utilizzo per la soluzione della crisi e dell’insolvenza (artt. 240, 2° comma, lett. c e 85, 3° comma, lett. a CCII). – 5. Il ruolo dell’opposizione dei creditori (art. 2503). – 6. (Segue) … ed il rilievo della disciplina civilistica dell’invalidità delle operazioni straordinarie (art. 2504-quater). – 7. I nuovi spunti offerti dall’irreversibilità degli effetti delle operazioni straordinarie concorsuali (art. 116, 5° comma, CCII). – 8. (Segue) …e dal nuovo testo dell’art. 33 CCII.
Keywords: Insolvency — Merger — Merged company — Indipendent bankruptcy procedure.
Causa concreta e struttura contrattuale: il paradigma dell’appalto privato
Abstract: Concrete cause and contractual structure: the paradigm of procurement contract – The contribution addresses the contract of works by focusing on the concrete cause and the set of interests the parties intend to pursue. Particular attention is devoted to the liability of the contractor under Article 1669 of the Civil Code, whose nature has traditionally been disputed between contractual and tortious reconstruction. The analysis highlights the role of business risk, the economic and social function of the contract, and the systematic consequences of the different qualifications. The provisions of Article 186 of the Insolvency Code are also examined, with regard to the effects of judicial liquidation on pending contracts. The result is a private-law perspective on the contract, grounded in the criterion of merit and in the parties’ interests, which leads to the view of a necessary “requalification” of the contractual scheme so as to adapt it to economic and legal reality.
Summary: 1. Contratto di appalto e definizione degli interessi delle parti. – 2. Gli interessi delle parti e l’acquisto della proprietà del bene oggetto di appalto. – 3. L’elemento del rischio nel contratto di appalto: il rischio di impresa. – 4. Il rilievo degli interessi delle parti nella valutazione dell’adempimento. – 5. La responsabilità dell’appaltatore: la posizione della giurisprudenza. – 6. Preferenza per inquadramento contrattuale della responsabilità ex art. 1669 c.c. – 7. L’art. 1669 c.c. ed il “sottosistema” della responsabilità nel contratto di appalto. – 8. La natura contrattuale della responsabilità dell’appaltatore. – 9. La previsione di cui all’art. 186 del Codice della Crisi: il dato normativo. – 10. Contratto di appalto e liquidazione giudiziale: gli interessi delle parti e la ratio della disciplina. – 11. Verso la necessità di una “riqualificazione” del contratto di appalto?
Keywords: Project Contract — Respective Interests — Dissolution of the Contract — Bankruptcy.
L’assemblea delle società quotate dall’emergenza pandemica alla riforma del TUF
Abstract: Shareholders’ meetings of listed companies: from the pandemic emergency to the reform of the Financial Market Act – This article traces the cross-time evolution of the rules governing shareholder meetings at Italian listed companies, from the Covid-19 emergency framework to the proposed amendments to the Consolidated Law on Finance (TUF), which implement a reform aimed at boosting the openness of capital markets. The baseline thesis is that such evolution entails a commendable shift from ritualistic formalism to functional optimization, yielding a more efficient way of holding meetings without sacrificing core governance rights. The author traces the consolidation of the ‘designated representative’ (RD) as a central proxy-voting hub and the rise of remote-only meetings, which have now been codified in the applicable law. Moreover, he analyses the proposed introduction of a threshold for participation in the floor discussion – i.e., up to 0.1% of share capital – as a reasonable barrier against increasingly common dilatory floor interventions, merely aimed at annoying the company and its officers. The envisaged new TUF, on the one hand, empowers the company’s articles of association or corporate governance bodies – that is, with a full-fledged exercise of autonomy – to decide whether the meeting debate should be circumscribed to shareholders with a material interest in corporate management; on the other, it preserves minorities’ rights to submit questions and proposals, as well as to vote (directly or via the RD), regardless of the stake held. Therefore, the ‘voice’ of shareholders would be steered toward pre-meeting engagement and binding voting instructions rather than open-microphone obstructionism. The paper discusses the most recent innovations while accounting for several changes that have occurred over a longer timespan: spanning from the 2003 structural reform of Italian corporate law to the EU Shareholder Rights Directives and the above-mentioned changes in domestic legislation. It does so by addressing relevant doctrinal opinions and, in drawing conclusions, by considering solutions adopted in foreign jurisdictions. The author argues that the proposed TUF provisions are fully consistent with principles of proportionality, transparency, and orderly markets, while likely improving overall participation, cost-effectiveness, and the quality of deliberation.
Summary: 1. Introduzione: come sta cambiando l’assemblea delle società quotate – 2. I caratteri dell’assemblea, e del suo svolgimento, dopo le ultime modifiche. Il ruolo del «rappresentante designato» – 3. L’evoluzione dell’ordinamento verso un assetto più semplice ed efficiente – 4. Alcune letture dottrinali dell’assemblea che cambia – 5. Conclusioni: sui pregi della “nuova” assemblea e l’opportunità di riservare la discussione ai soci con un effettivo interesse gestionale.
Keywords: Shareholder meetings — Shareholder rights — Designated representative — TUF — SRD — Remote-only meetings — Discussion threshold — Efficiency.
Liquidazione giudiziale e scioglimento delle società di capitali
Abstract: Judicial liquidation and dissolution of corporations – The essay examines the implications, both systematic and practical, arising from the decision, made by the law, to (once again) include judicial liquidation among the causes for dissolution of corporations. In particular, the author emphasizes how the reintroduction of judicial liquidation among the causes for dissolution of a company affects the functionality of the company in terms of the organization of its business activities and, in any case, significantly reduces the reorganization scope of judicial liquidation compared to not only composition with creditors but also bankruptcy, as configured in the previous regulatory system.
Summary: 1. Premessa. – 2. Le novità normative. – 3. Liquidazioni concorsuali e scioglimento delle società. – 4. La società di capitali in pendenza di liquidazione giudiziale: la struttura organizzativa. – 5. (Segue): l’assemblea. – 6. (Segue): i liquidatori. – 7. (Segue): la struttura finanziaria. – 8. Conclusioni.
Keywords: Corporations — Judicial Liquidations — Dissolution Cause.
Arbitrato e sospensione cautelare degli effetti delle decisioni sociali
Abstract: Arbitration and interim stay of the effects of corporate resolutions – The essay analyzes art. 838-ter, paragraph 4th, of the Italian code of civil procedure, which grants to the arbitration tribunal the power to order interim measures, in order to stay the effects of the resolutions approved by the shareholders’ meeting. First is considered the scope of such powers, with respect to the type of arbitration agreement included in the by-laws; then are considered the various kinds of companies and resolutions of the different corporate bodies. Thereafter, the essay focuses on key procedural issues, in particular with respect to the relationships with article 818 of the Italian code of civil procedure, which grants to the arbitrators the power to issue any type of interim measure. Finally, are examined the interactions with state courts jurisdiction, both in case of appeal against the arbitrators’ decision and in the event of request of an interim measure, prior to the commencement of the arbitration proceeding.
Summary: 1. Premessa: dall’art. 35, comma 5, d. lgs. n. 5/2003 all’art. 838-ter, comma 4, cod. proc. civ. – 2. L’ambito applicativo del potere di sospensiva: la convenzione di arbitrato; l’arbitrato irrituale. – 3. Segue: le decisioni assunte nell’ambito di società di persone; le deliberazioni degli organi di società di capitali, diversi dall’assemblea. – 4. Il coordinamento dell’art. 838-ter, comma 4, cod. proc. civ. con l’art. 818, comma 1, cod. proc. civ. – 5. Profili procedimentali. – 6. (Segue): il reclamo – 7. Conclusioni; le perduranti aporie della fase ante causam.
Keywords: Challenge of corporate bodies’ resolutions — Arbitration agreement — Power of the arbitrators to order interim measures — Stay of corporate resolutions.
Il limite all’attivo delle banche popolari dopo la Legge Capitali
Abstract: The Asset Threshold for Cooperative Popular Banks After Capital Markets Reform – This paper examines the amendment to the asset size limit applicable to Italian cooperative popular banks introduced by the Capital Markets Reform Act of 5 March 2024, No. 21, which doubled the statutory threshold from EUR 8 billion to EUR 16 billion in total assets, beyond which such banks are required to resolve upon their transformation into joint-stock companies. Building on the rationale underlying the original introduction of the asset size limit under Decree-Law No. 3 of 2015, the paper explores the reasons for the recent revision and its potential implications for the future of the cooperative popular banking sector, situating the amendment within the broader and ongoing reform of the Italian Financial Act (Legislative Decree No. 58/1998). The paper argues that the revision reflects a shift in regulatory strategy, moving away from forced “demutualization” toward more articulated forms of governance “hybridization”. It ultimately questions whether a partial, rather than complete, process of “companization” can provide a viable long-term solution to the trade-off between sound banking management, capitalization needs, and the preservation of cooperative-specific organizational features.
Summary: 1. Dal d.l. n. 3/2015 alla Legge Capitali. – 2. Il nuovo limite di attivo delle banche popolari: premesse. – 2.1. (Segue) Possibili ragioni della revisione: l’adeguamento postumo alle misure introdotte dal Decreto Sostegni-bis in tema di “azioni di finanziamento”. – 2.2. (Segue) La possibile incidenza prospettica della prossima normativa europea sulla risoluzione delle banche di medio-piccole dimensioni. – 2.3. (Segue) Il possibile apprezzamento legislativo di talune rinnovate forme di spontanea collaborazione tra le popolari residue. – 3. La forma cooperativa delle popolari ieri, oggi, domani, tra esigenze di sviluppo sostenibile e prospettive di riforma del mercato dei capitali. – 4. Alcune questioni tuttora aperte: la governance. – 5. (Segue) I rapporti col mercato: ha ancora senso l’obbligo di trasformazione? – 6. La banca popolare dalla “de-mutualizzazione” alla “ibridazione”.
Keywords: Cooperative banks — Cooperative law — Financial market law — Cooperative financing — Investor shares — Demutualization — Hybridization.
L’adeguatezza patrimoniale delle società di gestione del risparmio
Abstract: Capital adequacy of asset management companies – The paper deals with the issue of capital adequacy of asset management companies (SGRs), reconstructing the regulatory and interpretative framework, and analysing the specificities of regulatory capital, of the criteria for calculating capital elements, and of the implications of adequacy in some phases of the SGRs’ life, from incorporation to cross-border expansion. What emerges is the increasing recourse to the adoption of financial parameters and a dynamic-functional perspective, with an approach to which the recent regulatory innovations on organisational and financial structures introduced by the Corporate Crisis and Insolvency Code appear consistent.
Summary: 1. Premesse. – 2. Il patrimonio di vigilanza e il controllo prudenziale. – 3. La rilevanza dell’adeguatezza patrimoniale nelle diverse fasi della vita del Gestore. – 3.1. Programma e autorizzazione. – 3.2. Composizione e criteri di computabilità degli elementi del patrimonio di vigilanza. – 3.3. Gli elementi patrimoniali nella politica di contenimento del rischio (risk management). – 3.4. La politica di investimento. – 3.5. Apertura succursale transfrontaliera. – 3.6. I rischi legati all’ “incapienza” del fondo. – 4. I profili di adeguatezza finanziaria (la prospettiva dinamica).
Keywords: Asset Management Companies — Function of Capital Requirements — Crisis and Insolvency Law.
La partecipazione pubblica alla composizione organica degli enti fondazionali
Abstract: Participatory foundations and organizational structure – Compared to the well-established concept of foundations as an organisational tool used by public decision-makers to carry out public functions in an alternative or external way, participatory foundations are a relatively new phenomenon. This organisational structure is highly flexible, affording significant autonomy to private individuals in terms of the methods employed to achieve the binding founding objectives and the organic composition of the chosen administrative structure. Consequently, the foundation lends itself to the incorporation of disciplines beyond those set out in the Civil Code, including forms of public intervention in the economy that create a fragmented and heterogeneous landscape. Against this backdrop, this study addresses the question of whether the public conception of the model established by the legislator is a variant or exception to the codified model. The organisational composition of such entities has been examined, particularly to determine whether the entity is public or private.
Summary: 1. Ragioni per uno studio aggregante delle fondazioni legali attraverso l’analisi della composizione organica. – 2. L’organicità delle persone giuridiche fondazionali. – 3. Oltre i confini del non-profit negli enti fondazionali. – 4. (Segue) «Ordinamento e amministrazione» delle fondazioni, fra atipicità e commistione. – 5. La normatività delle fondazioni pubbliche. – 5.1. Gli interventi strutturali sulle fondazioni «cointeressate»: un nuovo modello legale? – 5.2. La dimensione “inclusiva” degli hub per l’innovazione tecnologica in forma fondazionale. – 6. Osservazioni conclusive sull’utilità di un “criterio organico” per la ricognizione del carattere di pubblicità nelle fondazioni partecipate.
Keywords: Participatory foundations — Legal nature — Organic criterion — Organisational composition — Administration of foundations — Public foundations — Innovation hub — Non-profit.
- <
- >
Dear user,
this functionality is available only for logged in users.
Not registered? The registration only takes a minute!
Double-click to remove the article from your favorites
Add this article to your favorites
Added to favorites
Add to favorites
credit
credits